Sierra Leone Enacts Controversial Counter-Terrorism Laws Threatening Freedoms

Sierra Leone’s new counter-terrorism laws may criminalize dissent against President Bio’s regime. Since 2018, the administration has faced accusations of state violence, leading to over 200 deaths. Critics argue the laws are implemented without public consultation and threaten the nation’s fragile democracy. Experts advocate for strong institutions rather than oppressive legislation.
Sierra Leone has introduced new counter-terrorism laws that echo draconian measures reminiscent of North Korea. Citizens criticizing President Julius Maada Bio’s administration now face potential labeling as terrorists, raising concerns over freedom of expression. Bio, who abolished the death penalty, has allegedly involved state-sanctioned killings of protesters since assuming power in 2018, with over 200 young lives reportedly lost to violence.
With the new legislation enacted on March 11, 2025, the ruling Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP) can intensify actions against political opposition and dissenters, particularly those utilizing social media. Critics claim the government expedited the bill’s passage through Parliament without adequate public engagement, allegedly supported by the passive opposition, the All People’s Congress (APC).
The context of global political changes, particularly those initiated by former U.S. President Donald Trump, appears to have influenced Sierra Leone’s governance. As respect for human rights diminishes, there is concern that politicians in low-income nations may become increasingly authoritarian, potentially endangering residents.
Sierra Leone’s already stringent Cyber Laws have been exacerbated by this newly enacted counter-terrorism regulation, threatening the fragility of its democracy. Advocates argue that instead of imposing harsher laws, the nation should focus on fostering strong institutions and leadership aimed at combating poverty and supporting citizens’ rights.
The enactment of counter-terrorism laws in Sierra Leone raises significant concerns regarding personal liberties and democratic integrity. Critics argue that the government’s actions, especially in light of recently reported state violence against protesters, threaten the foundation of civil liberty earned through struggle. The emphasis should shift towards building robust institutions and leadership that prioritize public welfare over oppressive measures.
Original Source: www.thesierraleonetelegraph.com