The Case for India’s Mediation in the Ukraine-Russia Conflict

India is positioned to mediate in the Ukraine-Russia war due to the timing and its acceptability among the involved nations. Three key reasons for mediation include current geopolitical dynamics, India’s broad diplomatic acceptability, and the potential for it to enhance its global stature. Nevertheless, concerns regarding possible failure and practical steps should be addressed for effective mediation.

India’s potential mediation in the Ukraine-Russia war is supported by three significant factors. First, the timing is pivotal. With Russia seeking to end sanctions and engage in discussions with major powers, India’s involvement could be crucial. The ongoing talks in Riyadh indicate that key players, including Ukraine, Europe, the USA, and Russia, may be willing to consult with India, which is seen as an acceptable intermediary.

Second, India enjoys broad acceptability among the nations involved in the conflict. Compared to other major players, such as China, which faces skepticism from the US, India can position itself as a trustworthy partner to facilitate dialogue. Third, mediating in this conflict aligns with India’s aspirations to establish itself as a prominent global power within a multipolar world, enhancing its diplomatic stature.

Finally, a ceasefire may necessitate guarantees against future aggression, where Indian peacekeepers could play a decisive role due to their neutrality. Instead of merely being involved in established frameworks, India should take the initiative to negotiate peace and ensure its maintenance.

However, three main reservations hinder India’s participation. There is a prevalent fear of failure should mediation efforts not yield results, but history shows that third-party mediation often brings geopolitical leverage for the mediator, regardless of immediate outcomes. India’s role should be to provide pathways for communication among the conflicting parties.

To progress, India should consider appointing a special envoy to engage discreetly with all stakeholders, gauging their positions and facilitating negotiations. The argument favoring India to await greater power before intervening is flawed; India possesses significant economic strength compared to other mediators in the conflict. Ultimately, it is time for India to take a proactive role in international mediation, recognizing its own strategic interests and capabilities.

In conclusion, India should leverage its geopolitical positioning to mediate in the Ukraine-Russia war. The timing is right, given the ongoing negotiations in Riyadh, and India’s broad acceptability among involved nations enhances its potential as a mediator. Moreover, engaging in mediation would serve India’s national interests and affirm its aspirations for greater global influence. By appointing a special envoy and taking proactive steps, India can fulfill its role on the international stage in peace negotiations.

Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com