Rwanda-Backed M23 Forces Intensify Control Over Goma, DRC
M23 rebels have tightened their control over Goma, leading to a humanitarian crisis with over 100 dead and nearly 1,000 injured. M23’s advance signals escalating conflict, while international calls for ceasefire grow amid warnings of a worsening humanitarian situation. Rwanda’s influence and calls for negotiation remain central to addressing the ongoing violence.
Rwanda-backed M23 rebels have increased their control over Goma, the largest city in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), marking a significant failure for the Congolese military and a serious escalation in ongoing conflicts. The M23 claimed to have taken Goma after days of fighting that resulted in more than 100 fatalities and nearly 1,000 injuries.
After the fighting briefly subsided, local media reported sporadic gunfire in northern Goma. According to Bertrand Bisimwa, head of M23’s political wing, the group intended to establish complete security in the city. Residents reported that M23 and Rwandan troops had taken control of key areas including the airport, while the city center experienced diminished activity, with emptied streets.
Rwanda’s regional ambassador, Vincent Karega, indicated that M23 would not halt its advances towards South Kivu, emphasizing ongoing negotiations with Kinshasa are unlikely. Sources revealed M23 had initiated a move towards Bukavu, the provincial capital, although this claim remains unverified.
As the humanitarian crisis deepens, various aid organizations have raised alarms regarding potential mass displacements and food shortages in Goma. Medecins Sans Frontieres reported injuries sustained during hospital operations, necessitating urgent medical supplies which are currently inadequate due to armed looting.
The International Committee of the Red Cross highlighted the dire impact on civilians, stressing the need for humanitarian workers’ safe access to provide essentials. The ongoing violence poses severe risks to food supplies and public health.
M23 is one of many armed factions in eastern DRC, with accusations of Rwandan support, which Kigali denies. The group’s origins date back to 2012, following grievances within the Congolese military. M23 briefly captured Goma that same year before retreating under international pressure.
Recent calls for a ceasefire have increased from international communities, including the United States and European nations. Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi declined to attend a crisis meeting with Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame, opting to make a domestic address instead.
The International Crisis Group urged for immediate negotiations to prevent further violence, warning that unchecked conflict could escalate and destabilize the region like past crises. A proposed compromise involves M23 withdrawal from Goma and the establishment of an alternative force to oversee order during negotiations.
Within eastern DR Congo, persistent armed conflicts have resulted in grave humanitarian crises, displacing millions and leading to countless casualties. In this context, the March 23 Movement (M23) has emerged as a notable armed group accused of receiving support from neighboring Rwanda. The current situation in Goma illustrates both the tangible impacts of armed conflict on urban populations and the complexities of regional political dynamics fueled by historical grievances and national rivalries. Rwanda’s involvement has sparked international scrutiny and diplomatic efforts aimed at conflict resolution. This includes discussions surrounding ceasefires and calls for negotiation, reflecting the urgent need to address humanitarian needs and restore stability.
In summary, the M23’s grip on Goma marks a critical moment in the ongoing conflict in eastern DRC, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis amid rising casualties and widespread displacement. International calls for a ceasefire and negotiations highlight the urgency of resolving issues in the region, while the historical context of M23’s emergence and Rwanda’s influence remain pivotal in understanding the complexities of this crisis. Continued advocacy for humanitarian access and support is essential to mitigate the impact on civilians as diplomatic efforts unfold.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
